<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush Gives Us Traffic &#8211; No Complaints Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://46and47.com/blogrush-gives-us-traffic-no-complaints-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://46and47.com/blogrush-gives-us-traffic-no-complaints-here/</link>
	<description>Building Niche Websites To Fund A Travel Bug</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=e060c0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush Works Best For Smaller Blogs &#124; Small Internet Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://46and47.com/blogrush-gives-us-traffic-no-complaints-here/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush Works Best For Smaller Blogs &#124; Small Internet Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://46and47.com/2007/10/03/blogrush-gives-us-traffic-no-complaints-here/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Even with my bad CTR, 0.15%, it is still worth using to me and I suspect it is for other small blogs as well. 21% of my visitors came from BlogRush since installing the widget. I would love to think my great titles caused this success but it was actually the bonus credits given to low traffic blogs. Check out my stats: 4% traffic credits and 96% bonus credits. Whoa. At least that solves the mystery I tried to figure out earlier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even with my bad CTR, 0.15%, it is still worth using to me and I suspect it is for other small blogs as well. 21% of my visitors came from BlogRush since installing the widget. I would love to think my great titles caused this success but it was actually the bonus credits given to low traffic blogs. Check out my stats: 4% traffic credits and 96% bonus credits. Whoa. At least that solves the mystery I tried to figure out earlier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

