Comments on: How Much Should You Talk About Your Sites? http://46and47.com/how-much-should-you-talk-about-your-sites/ Building Niche Websites To Fund A Travel Bug Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:38:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=20bfdc By: 47 http://46and47.com/how-much-should-you-talk-about-your-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-24 47 Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:20:16 +0000 http://46and47.com/2007/12/09/how-much-should-you-talk-about-your-sites/#comment-24 @Webjourneyman It is a lot more fun reading and writing about concrete examples for me too. Not mentioning your sites in public at all is probably the safest route. That leaves much less to talk about on a blog like this though :-) @Webjourneyman

It is a lot more fun reading and writing about concrete examples for me too. Not mentioning your sites in public at all is probably the safest route. That leaves much less to talk about on a blog like this though :-)

]]> By: Webjourneyman http://46and47.com/how-much-should-you-talk-about-your-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Webjourneyman Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:39:37 +0000 http://46and47.com/2007/12/09/how-much-should-you-talk-about-your-sites/#comment-22 I've given this some thought and talking in aggregate(s)(I had to use define: in google for that one) about all sites isn't as much fun. The closes thing I could think up as a solution was to run a sister site for each site mentioned, something similar but smaller, yet credible enough to make scrappers (for so are they called who strip sites of their content for their own) scratch their head in confusion. Still it seem's silly to go to those lengths and beats the purpose of being completely honest. And what is that all about to begin with? To be tempted to tell all about ones biz. I don't know, might be that the benefits or good will generated by giving away all secrets not only provides some unique content but also outweights any percieved danger from "bad webmasters". If warped to the print medium we all know what happens to authors who just copy others matterial, they get found out in the end. Might make sense in a webo 2 way? I’ve given this some thought and talking in aggregate(s)(I had to use define: in google for that one) about all sites isn’t as much fun. The closes thing I could think up as a solution was to run a sister site for each site mentioned, something similar but smaller, yet credible enough to make scrappers (for so are they called who strip sites of their content for their own) scratch their head in confusion.

Still it seem’s silly to go to those lengths and beats the purpose of being completely honest.

And what is that all about to begin with? To be tempted to tell all about ones biz. I don’t know, might be that the benefits or good will generated by giving away all secrets not only provides some unique content but also outweights any percieved danger from “bad webmasters”.

If warped to the print medium we all know what happens to authors who just copy others matterial, they get found out in the end. Might make sense in a webo 2 way?

]]>